法搜网--中国法律信息搜索网
可别等成了“戈多”――关于中国“后现代主义法学研究”的一点感想或提醒

   

   
可参看,冯象:“法律与文学(代序)”,《木腿正义》,,中山大学出版社,1999年。
   

   
James Boyd White, The Legal Imagination: Studies in the Nature of Legal Thought and Expression, Little, Brown, and Company, 1973.
   

   
Richard A. Posner, Law and Literature, A Misunderstood Relationship, Harvard University Press, 1988; Law and Literature, 2nd and enlarged ed., Harvard University Press, 1998.
   

   
“Ronald Coase and Methodology”, in Overcoming Law, Harvard University Press, 1995, pp. 406ff。应当注意,这种工具主义的经济学反基础论(或基础论?)为不少经济学家所分享。请看,周其仁:“研究真实世界的经济学”,《中国社会科学季刊》,1999年。
   

   
Richard Rorty, Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth, Philosophical Papers vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, 1991; and Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
   

   
Stanley Fish, The Trouble with Principle, Harvard University Press, 1999; and Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Community, Harvard University Press, 1980。应当注意,这两本书是两本文集,讨论的问题也并不仅仅是法律,甚至主要不是法律问题。
   

   
John Rawls, “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,” and “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical, in John Rawls, Collected Papers, ed. By Samuel Freeman, Harvard University Press, 1999, p.306, 393-394.
   

   
Overcoming Law, p.317.


第 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] 页 共[8]页
上面法规内容为部分内容,如果要查看全文请点击此处:查看全文
【发表评论】 【互动社区】
 
相关文章